Survey: Poor User Experience Leading Cause of Enterprise App Failure

The continued reliance on traditional app design and development is increasingly leading to enterprise mobile app failure, according to a new survey sponsored by Kony. More specifically, frequent design change requests and project delays caused by friction between mobile app developers and designers were cited as the leading causes of poor user adoption upon the apps’ release.

Michael Cusanelli, Associate Editor

December 31, 2014

3 Min Read
Dave Shirk executive vice president and chief marketing officer at Kony
Dave Shirk, executive vice president and chief marketing officer at Kony

The continued reliance on traditional app design and development is increasingly leading to enterprise mobile app failure, according to a new survey sponsored by Kony. More specifically, frequent design change requests and project delays caused by friction between mobile app developers and designers were cited as the leading causes of poor user adoption upon the apps’ release.

In the study, “Bridging the Gap: Mobile App Design and Development,” Kony surveyed more than 340 respondents globally, and found that 50 percent of respondents said their projects failed to lock or get approved because of user interface issues. User interface issues also are one of the largest causes of app delays during the design process, according to Kony. 

“Today’s IT departments are struggling to keep pace with the demands of their business to mobilize their enterprise,” said Dave Shirk, executive vice president and chief marketing officer at Kony, in a statement. “CIOs are faced with the challenge of rapidly delivering mobile applications for their businesses, and this survey sheds light on one of the biggest hurdles: business users, designers and developers don’t see eye to eye when it comes to user experience and interface design, which can cause costly delays and mobile app failures, leaving the business looking for a better answer.”

Here are some of the key findings from the survey, as outlined by Kony:

  • User interface is the main source of frustration: Developers said the three main reasons for changes to the user interface are because the user interface designs never get locked; the stakeholder identified issues in the user interface once they got to use the working application; or the user interface design failed to address one or more functional requirements.

  • Change requests slow down development time: More than half of developers said that 25 percent to 75 percent of their projects receive change requests that impact the user interface. Moreover, nearly 40 percent of developers said it takes 25 percent to 50 percent of additional development effort to address change requests that impact the user interface. Approximately one-third said it requires 50 percent to 100 percent more effort for development projects, and nearly 5 percent said change requests more than double the original development effort required.

  • Developers struggle with user interface and user experience: Designers cited communicating input back to developers on the mobile app prototype and successful collaboration with the developer during the development cycle as the most challenging aspects of working with their developer team to seamlessly create engaging mobile apps.

So what can developers do to improve their chances of success in the mobile app arena? The answer, it seems, is to place more emphasis on design in the first place. While this seems obvious upon first glance, many design elements are often overlooked during the development process, according to Shirk.

“To ensure mobile app success, businesses should take a holistic approach to mobile app development,” said Shirk. “Enterprises should design their app with a mobile perspective when it comes to look and feel of the app. Doing this in a collaborative way and leveraging cloud technology is far better than the classic design tools, which have zero functionality or relevance to support the rich and varied user experience requirements of mobile technology.”

Read more about:

AgentsMSPsVARs/SIs

About the Author

Michael  Cusanelli

Associate Editor, Penton Technology Group, Channel

Michael Cusanelli is the associate editor for Penton Technology’s channel properties, including The VAR Guy, MSPmentor and Talkin' Cloud. He has written articles and produced video for Newsday.com and is a graduate of Stony Brook University's School of Journalism in New York. In his spare time Michael likes to play video games, watch sci-fi movies and participate in all things nerdy. He can be reached at [email protected]

 

Free Newsletters for the Channel
Register for Your Free Newsletter Now

You May Also Like